Information about the article

Article type:
Original article

Index UDK: 343.326

Year, Volume, Number:
2024, Vol. 12, № 3 (47)

Pages: 74-84

ADMINISTRATIVE MEASURES IN THE FIELD OF COUNTERING TERRORISM IN RUSSIA AND ABROAD

Vladislav G. Romanovsky
Сandidate of Law, Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Law, Penza State University, 40 Krasnaya street, Penza, 440026, Russia, pgu-up406@mail.ru

EDN: RWZNIJ
DOI: 10.21685/2307-9525-2024-12-3-8

Category: PUBLIC LEGAL (STATE LEGAL) SCIENCES

For citation:
Romanovsky V.G. Administrative measures in the field of countering terrorism in Russia and abroad. Elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal "Nauka. Obshchestvo. Gosudarstvo" = Electronic scientific journal "Science. Society. State". 2024;12(3):74–84. (In Russ.). doi: 10.21685/2307-9525-2024-12-3-8

...................................

Received: 22.05.2024

Accepted: 30.07.2024
.......................................

Open access

Abstract
Background. Terrorism is a global threat that requires extraordinary countermeasures. Taking into account the fact that the main task of the state in this field is to prevent terrorist attacks, various administrative measures aimed at preventing criminal acts are increasingly in demand. The main aim is to study foreign practices of introducing administrative measures in the field of countering terrorism and preventing manifestations of terrorism. Materials and methods. The empirical basis of the study is made up of various foreign acts, among which the Internal Security Act of Singapore dated July 27, 1960 No. 18, Law of the French Republic dated October 30, 2017 No. 2017–1510 “Strengthening national security and combating terrorism” and Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures Act 2011 of the United Kingdom Act should be highlighted. The main research method is comparative legal, which allows transferring the foreign practices into Russian law-making practice. Results. The main conclusion is to determine the effectiveness of legislative acts that establish administrative measures against persons in respect of whom there are sufficient grounds for suspicion of involvement in terrorist activity. The main objective of such measures is terrorism prevention, identification of persons suspected of involvement in terrorist activity and their social rehabilitation. Conclusions. The article substantiates the need to establish registers of preventive records of persons suspected of involvement in terrorist activity and to introduce administrative control measures that provide for certain restrictions on the fundamental human and civil rights and freedoms.

Keywords
terrorism, administrative influence, control, restrictions on human rights, administrative accounting, counteraction

References
1. Aver'yanova N.N., Velieva D.S., Kapitonova E.A. et al. Prava cheloveka i bezopasnost' v sovremennom mire: gibridnye ugrozy i novye vyzovy: monografiya = Human rights and security in the modern world: Hybrid threats and new challenges: Monograph. Moscow: Prospekt, 2021:152. (In Russ.)
2. Spyropoulos A.Z., Ioannidis E., Antoniou I. Interoperability and Targeted Attacks on Terrorist
Organizations Using Intelligent Tools from Network Science. Information. 2023;14(10):580. doi: 10.3390/info14100580
3. Fu J., Fan Y., Wang Y., Wang S. Network Analysis of Terrorist Activities. Journal of Systems Science and Complexity. 2014;27:1079–1094. doi: 10.1007/s11424-014-3034-8
4. Spitzmuller M., Park G. Terrorist teams as loosely coupled systems. American Psychologist. 2018;73(4):491–503. doi: 10.1037/amp0000257
5. Jiang D., Wu J., Ding F. et al. An integrated deep-learning and multi-level framework for understanding the behavior of terrorist groups. Heliyon. 2023;9(8):e18895. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18895
6. LaFree G., Schwarzenbach A. Micro- and macro-level risk factors for extremism and terrorism: toward a criminology of extremist violence. Monatsschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform. 2021;104(3):184–202. doi: 10.1515/mks-2021-0127
7. Trimbur M., Amad A., Horn M., Thomas P., Fovet T. Are Radicalization and Terrorism Associated with Psychiatric Disorders? A Systematic Review. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 2021;141:214–222. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.07.002
8. Fang L., Fang H., Tian Y., Yang T., Zhao J. The alliance relationship analysis of international terrorist organizations with link prediction. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications. 2017;482:573–584. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2017.04.068
9. Bruneau E. Understanding the Terrorist Mind. Cerebrum. 2016;Nov 1:cer-13-16. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5198759/pdf/cer-13-16.pdf
10. Beydoun Khaled A. Lone Wolf Terrorism: Types, Stripes, and Double Standards. North-western University Law Review. 2018;112(5):1213–1244. Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.
edu/nulr/vol112/iss5/6/
11. Basova A.V., Velieva D.S., Kapitonova E.A. et al. Prava cheloveka i gibridnye voyny = Human rights and hybrid wars. Moscow: Prospekt, 2023:184. (In Russ.)
12. Aggarwal N.K. Analyzing predisposing, precipitating, and perpetuating factors of militancy through declassified interrogation summaries: A case study. Transcultural Psychiatry. 2021;58(5):683–696. doi: 10.1177/1363461520919317
13. Moghaddam F.M. The staircase to terrorism: a psychological exploration. American Psychologist. 2005;60(2):161–169. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.60.2.161
14. Cheong D. Selling Security: The War on Terrorism and the Internal Security Act of Singapore. The Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies. 2006;23(1):28–56. doi: 10.22439/cjas.v23i1.691
15. Romanovskiy G.B., Romanovskaya O.V. Prava cheloveka i borba s terrorizmom: zarubezhnyy opyt = Human rights and fight against terrorism: Foreign practices. Moscow: Prospekt, 2021:192. (In Russ.). doi: 10.31085/9785392310678-2021-192
16. Walker C., Cawley O. The Juridification of the UK’s Counter Terrorism Prevent Policy. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism. 2022;45(11):1004–1029. doi: 10.1080/1057610X.2020.1727098
17. Taylor J.D. «Suspect Categories», Alienation and Counterterrorism: Critically Assessing PREVENT in the UK. Terrorism and Political Violence. 2018;32(4):851–873. doi: 10.1080/09546553.2017.1415889
18. Sabir R. Blurred Lines and False Dichotomies: Integrating Counterinsurgency into the UK’s Domestic «War on Terror». Critical Social Policy. 2017;37(2):202–224. doi: 10.1177/0261018316683471
19. Walker F.R. The UK’s PREVENT Counter-Terrorism Strategy appears to promote rather than prevent violence. Journal of Critical Realism. 2019;18(5):487–512. doi: 10.1080/14767430.2019.1646095
20. Jupp J. From Spiral to Stasis? United Kingdom Counter-Terrorism Legislation and Extreme Right-Wing Terrorism. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism. 2022;September:1–21. doi: 10.1080/1057610X.2022.2122271

Дата создания: 18.07.2024 18:39
Дата обновления: 03.09.2024 20:15